MARY M. BEU, DESIGNATED IN THIS CAUSE AS MARY M. GLODE, ALIAS MARY M. BEU, APPELLANT,
v.
EMMA LILL BEU, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court affirmed a lower court's decree that declared the appellee the lawful widow of Gustav Beu and allotted her dower in his property. The appellant, who also claimed a relationship with the deceased, argued against this determination.
Yes, the appellee was the lawful wife of Gustav Beu at the time of his death and is entitled to dower in his real property.
“The primary relief sought by the appellee was a determination of her status or relationship with one Gustav Beu, deceased; i. e., whether or not at the time of his death the appellee was his wife and if so, incidental thereto, the assignment of dower in a certain parcel of real property.”
This quote describes the core issue and relief sought by the appellee in the trial court.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe appellee initiated a declaratory decree action seeking to establish her status as the lawful wife of Gustav Beu at the time of his death. She also…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Assignment Of Dower cases and more on FLexlaw
This appeal involves the correctness of a final decree entered in a declaratory decree action. The primary relief sought by the appellee was a determination of her status or relationship with one Gustav Beu, deceased; i. e., whether or not at the time of his death the appellee was his wife and if so, incidental thereto, the assignment of dower in a certain parcel of real property. The appellee prevailed and the final decree determining her to he the lawful widow of Gustav Beu was entered and dower was allotted.
We have examined the errors assigned and argued by the appellant, and find them to be without merit and affirm. See and compare: Coleman v. Davis, Fla.App.1958, 106 So.2d 81; Martz v. Riskamm, Fla.App.1962, 144 So.2d 83; In Re Coffey’s Estate, Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 568.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Ineyll Coleman v. Davis, 106 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958)
- Martz v. Riskamm, 144 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962)
- In re Est. of Harry E. Coffey, 171 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)