HILLER

v.

CICCONE, MEDICAL CENTER DIRECTOR; AND FURTAK V. MANCUSI, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (U.S. 1970)
• Runge v. United States, 427 F.2d 122 (10th Cir. 1970)
  …encourage guilty pleas and jury trial waivers, all such pleas and waivers are ipso facto coerced when the fear of death is shown to be a factor in the plea. Our rejection of that interpretation of Jackson has been affirmed in Brady v. United States, 396 U.S. 809, 90 S.Ct. 86, 24 L.Ed.2d 63 (1970). Jackson did not hold § 1201(a) inherently coercive of guilty pleas; neither did it rule that all guilty pleas encouraged by fear of a possible death sentence are involuntary; nor did it hold that guilty pleas, so…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Schram v. Hoyt C. Cupp, 436 F.2d 692 (9th Cir. 1970)
  …ous crime entered without counsel and without a waiver of counsel fully complying with the standards of Johnson v. Zerbst (1938) 304 U.S. 458, 58 S. [*695] Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461, is constitution-, ally infirm. (E. g., Brady v. United States (1970) 396 U.S. 809, 90 S.Ct. 86, 24 L.Ed.2d 63; McConnell v. Rhay (1968) 393 U.S. 2, 89 S.Ct. 32, 21 L.Ed.2d 2; Arsenault v. Massachusetts (1968) 393 U.S. 5, 89 S.Ct. 35, 21 L.Ed.2d 5; Mempa v. Rhay (1967) 389 U.S. 128, 88 S.Ct. 254, 19 L.Ed.2d 336.) The question is…