NEHRING

v.

EMPRESA LINEAS MARITIMAS ARGENTINAS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Goldstein v. Kelleher, 728 F.2d 32 (1st Cir. 1984)
  …to the verdict stipulation, clearly had identical interests at the trial. If each defendant had had even colorably different interests from the other, e.g., Nehring v. Empresa Lineas Maritimas Argentinas, 401 F. 2d 767 (5th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 819, 90 S.Ct. 55, 24 L.Ed.2d 69 (1969); Rogers v. DeVries & Co., 236 F.Supp. 110 (S.D.Tex. 1964), we would not question the magistrate’s discretion, but it is hard to see any reason here for not equalizing peremptories as between plaintiff and defendant…
• Standard Indus., Inc. v. Mobil OIL Corp., 475 F.2d 220 (10th Cir. 1973)
  …1970). In the instant case, we find no abuse of that discretion. See Albina Engine and Machine Works, Inc. v. Abel, 305 F. 2d 77 (10th Cir. 1962). See also Nehring v. Empresa Lineas Maritimas Argentinas, 401 F. 2d 767 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 819 (1969), 90 S.Ct. 55, 24 L.Ed.2d 69, where it was held that the plaintiff did not have a right to the same number of peremptory challenges as granted multiple defendants. 4. Evidence of Alleged Conspiracies Involving Sales of Liquid Asphalt in Kansa…
• Thaddeus Donald Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co., Inc., 895 F.2d 218 (5th Cir. 1990)
  …Cir.1972); Carey v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., 455 F. 2d 1192, 1194 (5th Cir.1972); United States v. Williams, 447 F. 2d 894, 896-97 (5th Cir.1971); Nehring v. Empresa Lineas Maritimas Argentinas, 401 F. 2d 767, 767-68 (5th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 819, 90 S.Ct. 55, 24 L.Ed.2d 69 (1969). . See Colgrove v. Battin, 413 U.S. 149, 93 S.Ct. 2448, 37 L.Ed.2d 522 (1973). . See Rosales-Lopez v. United States, 451 U.S. 182, 188-89, 101 S.Ct. 1629, 1634, 68 L.Ed.2d 22 (1981). . See United States v. Jones…