PHILLIPS ET UX.

v.

LATHAM

Citator

Cited By

• Langel v. United States, 451 F.2d 957 (8th Cir. 1971)
  …thout being in on it at its inception. One need only knowingly contribute his efforts in furtherance of it.” Nassif v. United States, 370 F. 2d 147, 152 (8th Cir. 1966). Accord, Miller v. United States, 410 F. 2d 1290, 1294 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 830, 90 S.Ct. 81, 24 L.Ed.2d 80 (1969). And “where it is established that a conspiracy has been [*962] formed, ‘but slight evidence connecting a defendant therewith may still be substantial, and if so, sufficient’.” Cave v. United States, supra, 390 F.…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Broad St. Hosp. & Med. Ctr., 452 F.2d 302 (3d Cir. 1971)
  …the bargaining sessions, with Weissman acting as the hospital spokesman, it can be said that the hospital led Local 1199 to believe Wiessman had the necessary authority. N.L.R.B. v. General Metal Products Co., 410 F. 2d 473 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 830, 90 S.Ct. 83, 24 L.Ed.2d 81 (1969). . The hospital raises vague contentions that such changes did indeed occur. But its assertions of union decertification by its employees and the appearance of a rival union lose their force in the hospital’s own…