HOLOCHUCK

v.

UNITED AIRCRAFT CORP.

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• Cent. Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, 511 U.S. 164 (U.S. 1994)
  …9-740 (CA10 1974); Landy v. FDIC, 486 F. 2d 139, 162-163 (CA3 1973), cert. denied, 416 U. S. 960 (1974); Strong v. France, 474 F. 2d 747, 752 (CA9 1973); Buttrey v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 410 F. 2d 135, 144 (CA7), cert. denied, 396 U. S. 838 (1969). See also Lanza v. Drexel & Co., 479 F. 2d 1277, 1301, 1303-1304 (CA2 1973) (en banc); Ruder, Multiple Defendants in Securities Law Fraud Cases: Aiding and Abetting, Conspiracy, In Pari Delicto, Indemnification, and Contribution, 120 U. Pa.…
• Rolf v. Blyth, 570 F.2d 38 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …bility. NYSE Rule 405 requires a broker to “know [his] customer.” Art. III § 2 NASD imposes supervision and suitability requirements on brokers. See Buttrey v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 410 F. 2d 135, 141 (7th Cir)., cert. denied, 396 U.S. 838, 90 S.Ct. 98, 24 L.Ed.2d 88 (1969); Starkman v. Seroussi, 377 F.Supp. 518 (S.D.N.Y.1974); cf. Colonial Realty v. Bache & Co., 358 F. 2d 178 (2d Cir.) (no liability under 1934 Act for failure to employ “just and equitable” principles of trade as requ…
• Miley v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., 637 F.2d 318 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …Corp. v. Bache & Co., 358 F. 2d 178, 182 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 817, 87 S.Ct. 40, 17 L.Ed.2d 56 (1966) (no cause of action exists) with Buttrey v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 410 F. 2d 135, 142 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 838, 90 S.Ct. 98, 24 L.Ed.2d 88 (1969) (cause of action exists). Oppenheimer attempts to project this court into the fray — a rather precarious position, and one in which we currently neither desire nor deserve to be — by arguing that Judge Mahon’s in…