SMITH ET UX.

v.

PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Onori, 535 F.2d 938 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …ut for the informer’s efforts by a government agent. See, e. g., United States v. Joseph, 533 F. 2d 282, 285 (5th Cir. 1976); United States v. Oquendo, 505 F. 2d 1307 (5th Cir. 1975); United States v. Durham, 413 F. 2d 1003 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 839, 90 S.Ct. 100, 24 L.Ed.2d 89 (1969); Henley v. United States, 406 F. 2d 705, 706 (5th Cir. 1969). Although government agents eventually participated in the case, the record does not show that Brown was directed by government agents [*943] to make a…
• United States v. Garcia, 528 F.2d 580 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …formant is paid a subsistence allowance and given a reward, as long as there is no evidence that he had been promised a specific sum to convict a particular person. United States v. Durham, 413 F. 2d 1003, 1004 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 839, 90 S.Ct. 100, 24 L.Ed.2d 89 (1969). We note that in the Durham case the amounts involved were [*587] relatively small; the informant was paid $10/day plus a $400 reward at the end of his employment. Id. In this case, the amount paid the informant…
• United States v. Blue, 440 F.2d 300 (7th Cir. 1971)
  …udgment vacated in part and remanded as to one defendant on other grounds; as to all other defendants, cert. den. 395 U.S. 830; Oden v. United States of America, 5 Cir., 1969, 410 F. 2d 103, 104, cert. den. sub nom. Lacy v. United States of America, 396 U.S. 839, 90 S.Ct. 100, 24 L.Ed.2d 90. As the government notes, this was a comparatively simple case of one count and only two defendants. In a multi-count indictment charging conspiracy, with three defendants, United States of America v. Kahn, 7 Cir., 1967…