DUFFY, ANCILLARY ADMINISTRATRIX

v.

WHARTON, ADMINISTRATOR

Citator

Cited By

• Irwin Popkin v. Warner B. Bishop, 464 F.2d 714 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …ct and Self-Aggrandizement, 15 N.y.L. Forum 332 (1969); Note, Schoenbaum v. First-brook: The “New Fraud” Expands Federal Corporation Law, 55 Va.L.Rev. 1103 (1969). . See also Levin v. Great Western Sugar Co., 406 F. 2d 1112 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 848, 90 S.Ct. 56, 24 L.Ed. 2d 97 (1969), a case close on its facts to the present case. . 405 F. 2d at 219-220: In the present ease it is alleged that Aquitaine exercised a controlling influence over the issuance to it of treasury stock of Banff for a…
• United States v. Johnson, 525 F.2d 999 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …U.S. 938, 93 S.Ct. 1897, 36 L.Ed.2d 399 (1973); United States v. Fioravanti, 412 F. 2d 407, 411-12 n. 12 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 837, 90 S.Ct. 97, 24 L.Ed.2d 88 (1969); United States v. Battaglia, 410 F. 2d 279, 283 (7 Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 848, 90 S.Ct. 73, 24 L.Ed.2d 97 (1969); see Kaplan v. United States, 375 F. 2d 895, 900 (9 Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 839, 88 S.Ct. 67, 19 L.Ed.2d 103 (1967). See also Walsh v. United States, 371 F. 2d 436 (1 Cir. 1967). The District of Columbia and…
• United States v. Erick Mitchell, 778 F.2d 1271 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …o grant or deny a motion for discovery is within the district judge’s discretion, and hence reversal is only warranted if the district judge abused his discretion. See United States v. Battaglia, 410 F. 2d 279, 280 (7th Cir.1969), certiorari denied, 396 U.S. 848, 90 S.Ct. 73, 24 L.Ed.2d 97; United States v. Pope, 409 F. 2d 371, 374 (7th Cir.1969). To the extent that defendant’s motion to compel discovery relates to a claim that the prosecution should be invalidated solely because the government did not mee…