MAYES ET AL.

v.

MCKEITHEN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Perez v. State, 980 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)
  …491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla.1986). Moreover, the statement did not implicate the defendant in the crime. The defendant’s convictions and sentence for attempted second-degree murder with a firearm and aggravated battery are affirmed. . Miranda v. Arizona, 396 U.S. 868, 90 S.Ct. 140, 24 L.Ed.2d 122 (1969). . Q. And as a matter of fact, I think you indicated when you were questioned earlier, [*1130] you had made some reference that you began to take your folder, put it together and you were walking out, right? A.…
• United States v. Shepard, 515 F.2d 1324 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
  …letion of the division of jurisdiction under the Court Reform Act. See D.C.Code § 11-502. . See Downum v. United States, 372 U.S. 734, 83 S.Ct. 1033, 10 L.Ed.2d 100 (1963); Newman v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 271, 410 F. 2d 259, cert. denied, 396 U.S. 868, 90 S.Ct. 132, 24 L.Ed.2d 121 (1969); Crawford v. United States, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 219, 285 F. 2d 661 (1960). . In the instant case, however, appellant’s appeal might constitute a waiver of any double jeopardy claim. United States v. Ball, 163 U.S.…
• United States v. Velazquez, 490 F.2d 29 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …Nor is it satisfactory to rely, as has been done in non-jury cases, simply on the fact that no evidentiary hearing was held by the trial court in disposing of the motion. See Newman v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 271, 410 F. 2d 259, cert, den., 396 U.S. 868, 90 S.Ct. 132, 24 L.Ed.2d 121 (1969). The critical question is whether the government’s action in prosecuting Velazquez, in both its administrative and judicial phases, reached the point where the government’s power to retrace its steps is checked b…