DELEVAY
v.
REYNOLDS, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS; CHARLAND V. NORGE DIVISION, BORG-WARNER CORP., ET AL.; LEE V. ALABAMA; BROWN ET AL. V. BETHANIA HOSPITAL ET AL.; BUCHANON V. MICHIGAN; NEAL ET AL. V. SAGA SHIPPING CO., S. A., ET AL.; SIMMONS V. UNITED STATES; RISPO V. PENNSYLVANIA; CHASE V. PENNSYLVANIA; KAMSLER V. PATE, WARDEN, ET AL.; FURTAK V. NEW YORK

U.S. | 1969-10-13
Nos. 1765; No. 1787; No. 1794; No. 1827; No. 1841; No. 1868; No. 1880; No. 1900; No. 1922; No. 1937; No. 1956
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
396 U.S. 871 Supreme Court of the United States (1969) Caution
Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • S. C. Loveland, Inc. v. E. W. Towing, Inc., 608 F.2d 160 (5th Cir. 1979)
    …rd one’s own person or property. Failure to act as one should may constitute contributory negligence. Neal v. Saga Shipping Co., S.A., 407 F. 2d 481 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 986, 89 S.Ct. 2143, 23 L.Ed.2d 775 (1968), rehearing denied, 396 U.S. 871, 90 S.Ct. 45, 24 L.Ed.2d 129 (1968). The district court found that the state breached its duty to exercise reasonable care and take reasonable precautions for the safety and protection of its own property and was therefore negligent, and that this…
  • Hageman v. Signal L. P. GAS, Inc., 486 F.2d 479 (6th Cir. 1973)
    …date of the original complaint, but will be governed by its own date. Standard Oil Company of California v. Perkins, 396 F. 2d 809, 814 (9th Cir. 1968), reversed on other grounds, 395 U.S. 642, 89 S.Ct. 1871, 23 L.Ed.2d 599 (1969), rehearing denied, 396 U.S. 871, 90 S.Ct. 36, 24 L. Ed.2d 126 (1969); Commissioner of In [*484] ternal Revenue v. Rieck, 104 F. 2d 294 (3d Cir. 1939), cert, denied, 308 U.S. 602, 60 S.Ct. 138, 84 L.Ed. 504 (1939). We have previously held that an amendment adding another party is…
  • Perkins v. Standard OIL Co. OF Cal., 474 F.2d 549 (9th Cir. 1973)
    …ition, Perkins had not mentioned attorneys’ fees for services rendered either in this court or in the Supreme Court, and the Court’s mandate was accordingly silent on the subject. Standard, following the Court’s denial of its petition for rehearing, 396 U.S. 871, 90 S.Ct. 36, 24 L.Ed.2d 126, paid Perkins the amount of the reinstated judgment. Perkins then filed an application in the District Court requesting that court to award him attorneys’ fees for services rendered him on the appeal to this court and in…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw