DUVAL
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1969-10-27
No. 426
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
396 U.S. 897 Supreme Court of the United States (1969) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Berlin Acey Odom v. United States, 455 F.2d 159 (9th Cir. 1972)
    …re a new trial in this case? We affirm. This circuit has held that the trial or sentencing judge is not disqualified from hearing and deciding a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C., § 2255. Dukes v. United States (9 Cir. 1969) 407 F. 2d 863, cert. denied, 396 U.S. 897, 90 S.Ct. 193, 24 L.Ed.2d 174; King v. United States (9 Cir. 1968) 402 F. 2d 58. The trial court held a hearing, took evidence on the mental competency issue and found against Odom. His findings are not clearly erroneous. The only substantial issu…
  • Gravenmier v. United States, 469 F.2d 66 (9th Cir. 1972)
    …rticular § 2255 motion. It is well established in this circuit that the trial judge can hear and decide motions made pursuant to 28 U. S.C. § 2255. Dukes v. United States, 407 F. 2d 863 (9th Cir., 1969), rehearing denied April 9, 1969, cert. denied 396 U. S. 897, 90 S.Ct. 193, 24 L.Ed.2d 174; Odom v. United States, 455 F. 2d 159 (9th Cir., 1972). The same rule applies even when the § 2255 motion is based on a claim that the trial judge should have disqualified himself from presiding over the trial. Judge Re…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw