SEGUROS TEPEYAC, S. A. COMPANIA MEXICANA DE SEGUROS GENERALES

v.

JERNIGAN

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• Blonder-Tongue Labs., Inc. v. Univ. of Ill. Found., 402 U.S. 313 (U.S. 1971)
  …App. D. C. 146, 417 F. 2d 714 (1969); Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Cas. Co., 411 F. 2d 88, 92-95 (CA3 1969); Seguros Tepeyac, S. A., Companía Mexicana v. Jernigan, 410 F. 2d 718, [*326] 726-728 (CA5 1969), cert. denied, 396 U. S. 905 (1969); Cauefield v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York, 378 F. 2d 876, 878-879 (CA5), cert. denied, 389 U. S. 1009 (1967); Graves v. Associated Transport, Inc., 344 F. 2d 894 (CA4 1965); Kurlan v. Commissioner, 343 F. 2d 625, 628-629 (CA2 1965); Unite…
• United States v. Twigg, 588 F.2d 373 (3d Cir. 1978)
  …me, then the defendant cannot raise the defense. See United States v. Garcia, 546 F. 2d 613, 615 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 958, 97 S.Ct. 1608, 51 L.Ed.2d 810 (1977); United States v. Conversano, 412 F. 2d 1143, 1148 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 905, 90 S.Ct. 219, 24 L.Ed.2d 181 (1969). However, no case has been found that considers this issue when overreaching by the Government is the basis of the defense. The fundamental fairness defense compels us to resolve this question in light of all the…
• In re Grand Jury Proceedings. United States v. Knox Jones, 517 F.2d 666 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …t. 55, 27 L.Ed.2d 57 (1970) (attorney allowed to testify that client, mail fraud defendant, caused checks to be mailed in order to purchase stock, for which purchase attorney was retained); In re Semel, 3 Cir. 1969, 411 F. 2d 195, 197, cert. denied, 396 U.S. 905, 90 S.Ct. 220, 24 L.Ed.2d 181 (1969) (attorney bankrupt tried to conceal from referee information about his own accounts receivable); United States v. Bartone, 6 Cir. 1968, 400 F. 2d 459, 461, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1027, 89 S.Ct. 631, 21 L.Ed.2d 57…

  ← 1 / 2 →