SNYDER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• In re Grand Jury Witness. United States v. Grand Jury Witness, 835 F.2d 437 (2d Cir. 1987)
  …g, viable, continuing order that Arambulo had a duty to obey. Nor did the adjournments that were sought for defense counsel’s benefit or Arambulo’s convenience vitiate the subpoena. In United States v. Snyder, 413 F. 2d 288 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 907, 90 S.Ct. 223, 24 L.Ed.2d 183 (1969), the government had an arrangement under which the subpoenaed witness agreed to be “on call” to testify. This arrangement was held to have no effect on the continuing vitality of the subpoena, and could not be co…
• Nelson v. Fulcomer, 911 F.2d 928 (3d Cir. 1990)
  …d 832 (1984) (post Innis); Hill v. Whealon, 490 F. 2d 629 (6th Cir.1974); People v. Doss, 44 Ill.2d 541, 256 N.E. 2d 753 (1970); State v. Welch, 4 Or.App. 225, 476 P. 2d 822 (1970); Howell v. State, 5 Md.App. 337, 247 A. 2d 291 (1968), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 907, 90 S.Ct. 224, 24 L.Ed.2d 183 (1969). Only the Ninth Circuit has attempted to reconcile the Innis test and the cases holding that the police do not "interrogate” when they confront suspects with highly incriminating testimony. In United States v. T…
• Vogel v. Tenneco Oil Co., 465 F.2d 563 (D.C. Cir. 1972)
  …where none exists, in order to support his untenable interpretive position. . Tenneco had the right under Oklahoma law to apply to the Corporation Commission for such an order. See Sunray DX Oil Co. v. Cole, 461 P. 2d 305 (Okl.1967), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 907, 90 S.Ct. 223, 24 L.Ed.2d 183 (1969); Nisbet v. Midwest Oil Corp., 451 P. 2d 687 (Okl.1968). . It is also important to note the following portion of paragraph 11 of the lease agreement: 11. All covenants of this lease, both express and implied, sh…