YARNAL

v.

PENNSYLVANIA

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Walsh v. State, 606 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)
  …ion (d) without the need for a dangerous weapon, see, e.g., United States v. Beasley, 438 F. 2d 1279 (6th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 866, 92 S.Ct. 124, 30 L.Ed.2d 110 (1971), United States v. Rizzo, 409 F. 2d 400 (7th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 911, 90 S.Ct. 226, 24 L.Ed.2d 187 (1969), Gant v. United States, 161 F. 2d 793 (5th Cir.1947), while other circuits ruled that a dangerous weapon was necessary to implicate subsection (d) in every event. See, e.g., United States v. Crew, 538 F. 2d 575 (…
• Bradley v. United States, 447 F.2d 264 (8th Cir. 1971)
  …ssaults any person” clause from the “jeopardy” clause. With the placement of the comma after “person,” several cases have held that subsection (d) is to be read disjunctively.20 United States v. Rizzo, 409 F. 2d 400, 402 (7 Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 911, 90 S.Ct. 226, 24 L.Ed.2d 187; Gant v. United States, 161 F. 2d 793 (5 Cir. 1947); United States v. Murray, 149 F. 2d 932 (3 Cir. 1945). We need not decide this question. We simply hold here that proof of an “assault” under § 2113(d) requires not on…
• United States v. Dupree, 544 F.2d 1050 (9th Cir. 1976)
  …minal assaults, R. Perkins, supra at 116-17; W. LaFave & A. Scott, Criminal Law, § 82 (1972), and are included under the federal definition of assault. See United States v. Bell, supra; United States v. Rizzo, 409 F. 2d 400 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 911, 90 S.Ct. 226, 24 L.Ed.2d 187 (1969). Thus an assault is committed by either a willful attempt to inflict injury upon the person of another, or by a threat to inflict injury upon the person of another which, when coupled with an apparent present abi…