MEAD

v.

GRUDE

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Johnson, 577 F.2d 1304 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …n v. United States, 407 F. 2d 448 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977, 89 S.Ct. 2129, 23 L.Ed.2d 765 (1969). See generally United States v. Milder, 459 F. 2d 801 (8th Cir. 1972); United States v. Walden, 411 F. 2d 1109 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 931, 90 S.Ct. 271, 24 L.Ed.2d 230 (1969); Hartman v. Switzer, 376 F.Supp. 486 (W.D.Pa.1974); Stoltzfus v. United States, 264 F.Supp. 824 (E.D.Pa.1967), aff’d, 398 F. 2d 1002 (3d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1020, 89 S.Ct. 627, 21 L.Ed.2d 565 (1969…
• United States v. Truong Dinh Hung, 629 F.2d 908 (4th Cir. 1980)
  …ently suspect of illegal activities. A neutral registration requirement, such as this one directed at representatives of foreign nations, does not offend the Fifth Amendment. See United States v. Walden, 411 [*920] F. 2d 1109 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 931, 90 S.Ct. 271, 24 L.Ed.2d 230 (1969). The defendants also contend that § 951 is impermissibly vague and overbroad. Their principal objection is to the word “agent.” “Agent” as used in this context, however, is a readily understandable term which pr…
• United States v. Errol Bernard Resnick, 488 F.2d 1165 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …e the challenged laws sub judice are not directed at a highly selective group inherently suspect of criminal acts, as was the situation in Marchetti and its progeny, see e. g. United States v. Walden, 4 Cir. 1969, 411 F. 2d 1109, 1111, cert. denied, 396 U.S. 931, 90 S.Ct. 271, 24 L.Ed.2d 230. Rather the statutes regulate an essentially noncriminal activity, the sale of firearms. Such regulation is permissible under the “required records” doctrine established by decisions such as Shapiro v. United States, 19…