LIZARRAGA

v.

UNDERWOOD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Crisp, 435 F.2d 354 (7th Cir. 1970)
  …xpressed desire to pass information to the Assistant United States Attorney even after having been informed of his rights and regardless of the absence of his attorney. Cf. Arrington v. Maxwell, 409 F. 2d 849, 853 (6th Cir. 1969), certiorari denied, 396 U.S. 944, 90 S.Ct. 381, 24 L.Ed.2d 245. Defendant further claims that the interrogation proceeded in violation of Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201, 84 S.Ct. 1199, 12 L.Ed.2d 246, because it took place after his indictment without the presence of defen…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Noti, 731 F.2d 610 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …. We are not permitted, however, merely to apply the plain language of Miranda to the case before us. Rather, we must examine the Miranda warnings from a practical viewpoint. Camacho v. United States, 407 F. 2d 39, 42 n. 2 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 944, 90 S.Ct. 380, 24 L.Ed.2d 245 (1969). If a defendant has been told the substance of his constitutional rights, it is not fatal if irrelevant words [*615] or words with no independent substance are omitted. See California v. Prysock, 453 U.S. at 359,…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. COX, 428 F.2d 683 (7th Cir. 1970)
  …emained mysteriously anonymous and silent. Cf. United States v. Marcus, 401 F. 2d 563, 567 (2d Cir. 1968), certiorari denied, 393 U.S. 1023, 89 S.Ct. 633, 21 L.Ed.2d 567; Camacho v. United States, 407 F. 2d 39, 45 (9th Cir. 1969), certiorari denied, 396 U.S. 944, 90 S.Ct. 380, 24 L.Ed.2d 245; Hayes v. United States, 368 F. 2d 814 (9th Cir. 1966); Talbot v. Nelson, 390 F. 2d 801, 803 (9th Cir. 1968); Jacobs v. United States, 395 F. 2d 469, 477 (8th Cir. 1968); United States v. Nasta, 398 F. 2d 283, 285 (2d C…