STANLEY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• United States v. Vasquez, 638 F.2d 507 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …oncluded that “the well founded advice of a law enforcement agent that, absent a consent to search, a warrant can be obtained does not constitute coercion.” Id. at 495. By contrast, in United States v. Curiale, 414 F. 2d 744 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 959, 90 S.Ct. 433, 24 L.Ed.2d 424 (1969), in which there was no probable cause basis for the issuance of a warrant and the agents were aware of that fact, the court expressed reservation as to whether a consent would have been upheld if the agents had a…
• United States v. Fearns, 501 F.2d 486 (7th Cir. 1974)
  …onsider it for that purpose. We have some doubt about the admissibility of the evidence to show intent, because the acts with which Fearns was charged were hardly equivocal. United States v. Stanley, 411 F. 2d 514, 516 (7th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 959, 90 S.Ct. 432, 24 L.Ed.2d 423 (1969). The government’s evidence was that Fearns and Little handed the four unendorsed checks payable to strangers to Diann Morris, took her to the banks to cash them, and divided the proceeds with her. It is hardly co…
• United States v. Fench, 470 F.2d 1234 (D.C. Cir. 1972)
  …ssession is otherwise satisfactorily explained.18 More specifically, courts have affirmed the application of this inference in cases involving the receipt of stolen property. See United States v. Curiale, 414 F. 2d 744, 748 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 959, 90 S.Ct. 433, 24 L.Ed. 424 (1969); Williams v. United States, 281 A. 2d 293, 294 (D.C.App.1971). See also Blue v. United States, 270 A. 2d 508 (D.C.App.1970). Since the trial court’s instruction in the instant case,19 regarding the proper inference…