VAN HOUTEN

v.

RALLS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (21 total)

• Gutierrez de Martinez v. Lamagno, 515 U.S. 417 (U.S. 1995)
  …language to permit district courts to hear motions to remand challenging the Attorney General’s seope-of-employment determination. See McGowan v. Williams, 623 F. 2d 1239, 1242 (CA7 1980); Van Houten v. Ralls, 411 F. 2d 940, 942 (CA9), cert. denied, 396 U. S. 962 (1969); Daugherty v. United States, 427 F. Supp. 222, 223-224 (WD Pa. 1977); accord, Seiden v. United States, 537 F. 2d 867, 869 (CA6 1976); Levin v. Taylor, 464 F. 2d 770, 771 (CADC 1972). Given the express permissibility of a motion to remand in…
• Meeker v. United States, 435 F.2d 1219 (8th Cir. 1970)
  …ss.; S.Rep.No.736, 87th Cong., 1st Sess; 107 Cong.Rec. 18,499-500, 87th Cong., 1st Sess., U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 1961, p. 2784; Carr v. United States, 422 F. 2d 1007 (4tli Cir. 1970); Van Houten v. Ralls, 411 F. 2d 940 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 962, 90 S.Ct. 436, 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969); Noga v. United States, 411 F. 2d 943 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 841, 90 S.Ct. 104, 24 U.Ed.2d 92 (1969); Vantrease v. United States, 400 F. 2d S53 (6th Cir. 1968). See generally Annot. 16 A.L.R.3d 1394,…
• Am. Gen. Ins. Co. & Fid. & Deposit Co. of Md. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 496 F.2d 197 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …3, 89 S.Ct. 1657, 1662, 23 L.Ed.2d 194 (1969). Of course, the doctrine has numerous exceptions. Id. ' In a comprehensive and learned review of this area of the law, this court in United States v. Feaster, 410 F. 2d 1354 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. den., 396 U. S. 962, 90 S.Ct. 427, 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969), described the relevant exceptions to the rule that administrative remedies must be exhausted prior to review by the courts. The first factor which would permit premature resort to judicial remedies is an interna…