ANDERSON

v.

CLAY CIRCUIT COURT ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Noble C. Beasley, 519 F.2d 233 (8th Cir. 1975)
  …denials. E. g., United States v. Crisona, 416 F. 2d 107, 116 (2nd Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 961, 90 S.Ct. 993, 25 L.Ed.2d 253 (1970); United States v. Harris, 409 F. 2d 77, 80-81 (4th Cir.), cert. denied sub. nom., Venning v. United States, 396 U.S. 965, 90 S.Ct. 447, 24 L.Ed.2d 430 (1969). Similarly, Beasley’s contention that the trial court’s refusal to permit further cross-examination into Diamond’s status as an informer violated his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation is baseless. Considera…
• United States v. Am. Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp., 433 F.2d 174 (3d Cir. 1970)
  …1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 961, 90 [*203] S.Ct. 993, 25 L.Ed.2d 253 (1970)United States v. Evanchik, 413 F. 2d 950, 952-953 (2d Cir. 1969); United States v. Harris, 409 F. 2d 77, 80-81 (4th Cir.), cert. denied sub. nom., Venning v. United States, 396 U.S. 965, 90 S.Ct. 447 24 L.Ed. 430 (1969). It follows that appellants’ motion to have the Kramer statements produced to them must be denied. Appellants also contend that the' Kramer. statements should have been produced at trial pursuant to the Jencks Act.…
• United States v. Laughman, 618 F.2d 1067 (4th Cir. 1980)
  …and participation, may also be proven by circumstantial evidence. Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80, 62 S.Ct. 457, 469, 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942); United States v. Harris, 409 F. 2d 77, 83 (4th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Brown v. United States, 396 U.S. 965, 90 S.Ct. 443, 24 L.Ed.2d 430 (1969), and Venning v. United States, 396 U.S. 965, 90 S.Ct. 447, 24 L.Ed.2d 430(1969). Accordingly, we must review the evidence against each appellant and determine whether it is sufficient to sustain a conspiracy con…

  ← 1 / 2 →