JAMES TALCOTT, INC.

v.

IVOR B. CLARK CO., INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Davis v. Hill Eng'g, Inc., 549 F.2d 314 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …oard any particular barge and never slept or ate aboard the barges or towing vessels, was not permanently assigned to the barge on which he was injured. See also Thomas v. Peterson Marine Service, Inc., 5 Cir.1969, 411 F. 2d 592, cert. denied, 1970, 396 U.S. 1006, 90 S.Ct. 562, 24 L.Ed.2d 499; Labit v. Carey Salt Co., 5 Cir.1970, 421 F. 2d 1333; Cox v. Otis Engineering Corp., 5 Cir.1973, 474 F. 2d 613; Dugas v. Pelican Construction Co., 5 Cir.1973, 481 F. 2d 773 cert. denied sub nom.; Union Oil Co. of Califo…
• United States v. Martinez, 479 F.2d 824 (1st Cir. 1973)
  …cluding his discussion with the agent showing knowledge of the March 9 sale, was relevant to his guilt under Count One. We find no misjoinder of counts in the single indictment. See United States v. Scott, 413 F. 2d 932 (7th Cir. 1969), cert. denied 396 U.S. 1006, 90 S.Ct. 560, 24 L.Ed.2d 498 (1970). Appellant argues that since Garcia did not participate in the trial, the presumptive benefits to the government of joinder evaporated. In King we spoke of such benefits as a rationale for Rule 8(b). But we did…
• United States v. Russo, 480 F.2d 1228 (6th Cir. 1973)
  …y were charged together in paragraph I of each count and separately in paragraph II of each. The fact that no conspiracy was charged does not indicate that there was a misjoinder. United States v. Scott, 413 F. 2d 932 (7th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1006, 90 S.Ct. 560, 24 L.Ed.2d 498 (1970). The appellant argues that the jury’s finding of each defendant guilty on separate counts coupled with its finding of no joint guilt on any count is proof of misjoinder. As was held in Cacy v. United States, 298…