PYLE

v.

OHIO

Citator

Cited By (44 total)

• Cnty. OF Dade v. Eleanora A. G. Callahan, 259 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
  …and City of Piqua v. Hinger, 15 Ohio St.2d 110, 238 N.E. 2d 766 (1968). Cf. State v. Mitchell, Fla.1971, 245 So. 2d 618; and State v. Liefert, Fla. App. 1971, 247 So. 2d 18. In State v. Pyle, 19 Ohio St.2d 64, 249 N.E. 2d 826 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1007, 90 S.Ct. 561, 24 L.Ed.2d 498 (1970), [*507] the Supreme Court of Ohio held that Miranda warnings do not apply in an offense where the defendant was charged and convicted of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.…
• Berkemer v. McCARTY, 468 U.S. 420 (U.S. 1984)
  …dent renewed his constitutional claim. Relying on a prior decision by the Ohio Supreme Court, which held that the rule announced in Miranda “is not applicable to misdemeanors,” State v. Pyle, 19 Ohio St. 2d 64, 249 N. E. 2d 826 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U. S. 1007 (1970), the Court of Appeals rejected respondent’s argument and affirmed his conviction. State v. McCarty, No. 80AP-680 (Mar. 10, 1981). The Ohio Supreme Court dismissed respondent’s appeal on the ground that it failed to present a “substantial cons…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Harris, 542 F.2d 1283 (7th Cir. 1976)
  …d. Hostility or conflict between defendants is not sufficient to require severance, and the parties have never explained how their defenses are mutually exclusive or conflict. United States v. Hutul, 416 F. 2d 607, 620 (7th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1007, 1012, 1024, 90 S.Ct. 573, 24 L.Ed.2d 504 (1970). Finally, favorable treatment granted to witnesses by the Government in return for their testimony may present a basis for challenging a witness’ credibility, but it does not present a basis for sever…