RUFFALO

v.

MAHONING COUNTY BAR ASSN.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Peskin, 527 F.2d 71 (7th Cir. 1975)
  …overnment intentionally delayed referral of the case to the Intelligence Division to avoid the Dickerson holding. This issue was reserved in Dickerson’s companion case, United States v. Habig, 413 F. 2d 1108, 1111 n. 4 (7th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1014, 90 S.Ct. 559, 24 L.Ed.2d 506. Whether we must now reach it requires examination of the events leading up to the formal opening of the Intelligence Division tax case against Peskin. The initial IRS contact with Peskin occurred during the summer of…
• United States v. Horton R. Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …must be remanded for further proceedings where the point might be raised, indicate that we should rule on it now. . United States v. Dickerson, 413 F. 2d 1111 (7th Cir. 1969), and United States v. Habig, 413 F. 2d 1108 (7th Cir. 1969), cert. den., 396 U.S. 1014, 90 S.Ct. 559, 24 L.Ed.2d 506 (1970). (The Miranda issue was not presented to the Court in the Application for Writ of Certiorari.). See also United States v. Campione, 416 F. 2d 486 (7th Cir. 1969). . “The distinction and its significance has been…
• Cyril v. Dornan, 460 F.2d 425 (9th Cir. 1972)
  …occurs within the scope of an employee’s federal employment depends upon an analysis of the facts under the law of the place where the tort occurred. 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). United States v. McRoberts, 409 F. 2d 195, 197 (9th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1014, 90 S.Ct. 551, 24 L.Ed.2d 505 (1970); Williams v. United States, 350 U.S. 857, 76 S.Ct. 100, 100 L.Ed. 761 (1955), reversing 215 F. 2d 800 (9th Cir. 1954); Murphey v. United States, 179 F. 2d 743 (9th Cir. 1950); Fries v. Unit [*428] ed States, 170…