UNITED STATES

v.

WHITE

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Carlton E. Bryant, 439 F.2d 642 (D.C. Cir. 1971)
  …), may lead the Supreme Court to reverse itself on this issue. But the Court itself now has the question before it, United States v. White, 7 Cir., 405 F. 2d 838, cert. granted, 394 U.S. 957, 89 S.Ct. 1305, 22 L.Ed.2d 559 (1969), set for reargument, 396 U.S. 1035, 90 S.Ct. 677, 24 L.Ed.2d 679 (1970), and we must await its decision, relying in the meantime on Lopea. . Agent Warden testified that the purpose of the surveillance was strictly “protective” — to see that no harm came to Agent Pope. If that was so…
• United States v. Cesare Viviano, 437 F.2d 295 (2d Cir. 1971)
  …t 551-552. See also United States v. Knohl, infra, 379 F. 2d 427 at 443. Contra, United States v. White, 405 F. 2d 838 (7 Cir.) (en, bane), certiorari granted, 394 U.S. 957, 89 S.Ct. 1305, 22 L.Ed.2d 559 (1969), restored to calendar for re-argument, 396 U.S. 1035, 90 S.Ct. 677, 24 L.Ed.2d 679 (1970). . That Viviano’s admissions were of past criminal conduct rather than statements made during the commission of and in furtherance of a crime, as in Kaufer, is not a distinguishing factor, because the Fourth Ame…
• United States v. DiLORENZO, 429 F.2d 216 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …223, 22 L.Ed.2d 414 (1969), see United States v. Bennett, 409 F. 2d 888 (2d Cir.1969); contra: United States v. White, 405 F. 2d 838 (7 Cir.1969), cert. granted, 394 U.S. 957, 89 S.Ct. 1305, 22 L.Ed.2d 559 (1969), restored to calendar for reargument 396 U.S. 1035, 90 S.Ct. 677, 24 L.Ed.2d 679 (1970). Thus, planting the concealed recording device on Von Zamft did not constitute an unconstitutional intrusion upon Di-Lorenzo’s fourth amendment rights.2 United States v. Kaufer, supra. Appellant additionally cl…