LAWLER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (52 total)

• Smith v. State, 305 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
  …remarks are no more than comments upon the failure to provide explanations of incriminating circumstances, and as such, they are not reversible. See State v. Hines, Fla.1967, 195 So. 2d 550; Reilly v. State, Fla.App.1968, 212 So. 2d 796, cert. den. 396 U.S. 1046, 90 S.Ct. 697, 24 L.Ed.2d 690 (1970). Wide latitude is permitted on cross-examination of witnesses, and limitations on the range are within the discretion of the trial court. Matera v. State, Fla.App.1969, 218 So. 2d 180. Defendant Tigner raised a…
• United States v. Isaacs, 493 F.2d 1124 (7th Cir. 1974)
  …should do so. But, while he may strike hard blows, he is not at liberty to strike foul ones.” An advocate is “permitted considerable latitude in replying to his opponent’s arguments.” United States v. Lawler, 7 Cir., 413 F. 2d 622, 628, cert. denied 396 U.S. 1046, 90 S.Ct. 698, 24 L.Ed.2d 691; United States v. Hoffa, 6 Cir., 349 F. 2d 20, 51, aff’d 385 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 408, 17 L.Ed.2d 374; and see Lawn v. United States, 355 U.S. 339, 359-360, n. 15, 78 S.Ct. 311, 2 L.Ed.2d 321. With these principles in min…
• United States v. Polizzi, 500 F.2d 856 (9th Cir. 1974)
  …uest for a reading of the testimony about the Lands conversation was not an abuse of its discretion.72 United States v. Baxter, 492 F. 2d 150, 175 (9th Cir. 1973); United States v. De Palma, 414 F. 2d 394, 396-397 (9 Cir. 1969), cert. denied, [*896] 396 U.S. 1046, 90 S.Ct. 697, 24 L.Ed.2d 690 (1970). X. Concealment of Prosecution Promises of Leniency Appellants contend that the prosecution failed to disclose its agreements with or promises of leniency to its key witness, Maurice Friedman, as required by Gi…