WILLIAMS ET AL.

v.

WISCONSIN BARGE LINE, INC.; AND WISCONSIN BARGE LINE, INC. V. WILLIAMS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (30 total)

• Geders v. United States, 425 U.S. 80 (U.S. 1976)
  …is determination will be reviewed only for abuse of discretion. Goldsby v. United States, 160 U. S. 70, 74 (1895); United States v. Martinez-Villanueva, 463 F. 2d 1336 (CA9 1972); Nelson v. United States, 415 F. 2d 483, 487 (CA5 1969), cert. denied, 396 U. S. 1060 (1970). Within limits, the judge may control the scope of rebuttal testimony, United States v. Chrzanowski, 502 F. 2d 573, 575-576 (CA3 1974); United [*87] States v. Perez, 491 F. 2d 167, 173 (CA9), cert. denied sub nom. Lombera v. United States, 41…
• United States v. Mayo Perez, 489 F.2d 51 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …1216; Castro v. United States, 5 Cir., 1961, 296 F. 2d 540; United States v. Warner, 5 Cir., 1971, 441 F. 2d 821, cert. denied, 1971, 404 U.S. 829, 92 S.Ct. 65, 30 L.Ed.2d 58; Nelson v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 415 F. 2d 483, cert. denied, 1970, 396 U.S. 1060, 90 S.Ct. 751, 24 L.Ed.2d 754. Since conspiracy is a crime which by its nature tends to be secret, the agreement is seldom susceptible, of direct proof. See, e. g., Krulewitch v. United States, 1949, 336 U.S. 440, 69 S.Ct. 716, 93 L.Ed. 790; Marrash…
• United States v. Evans, 572 F.2d 455 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …e and that he aided in the conspiracy. See Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 72 S.Ct. 240, 96 L.Ed. 288 (1952); United States v. Gallishaw, 428 F. 2d 760 (5th Cir. 1970); Nelson v. United States, 415 F. 2d 483 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1060, 90 S.Ct. 751, 24 L.Ed.2d 754 (1970). Indeed, the evidence revealed that Gent was one of the major figures in the conspiracy. Although there was no dispute at trial that Gent’s duties caused him to be absent from the CRCAP office much of the time,…