PARKER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• In re Kenneth Tierney. In re Paschal Morahan. In re Daniel Crawford. In re Mathias Reilly. In re Thomas Laffey, 465 F.2d 806 (5th Cir. 1972)
  …r claim on the following reasoning, which we find to be apt, although the appeal was later ordered dismissed as being moot. In re Parker, 10 Cir., 1969, 411 F. 2d 1067, vacated and remanded for dismissal as being moot, Parker v. United States, 1970, 397 U.S. 96, 90 S.Ct. 819, 25 L.Ed.2d 81. “Rule 6(e), Fed.R.Crim.P., with an exception not applicable herein, prevents disclosure of matters occurring before the grand jury unless otherwise ordered by a federal court and since for a court to so order under the…
• United States v. Yanagita, 552 F.2d 940 (2d Cir. 1977)
  …wholesale refusal to respond to any questions posed to them at the trial denied them this chance and was unjustified by the speculative nature of their claim. See In re Parker, 411 F. 2d 1067, 1069, vacated as moot sub nom. Parker v. United States, 397 U.S. 96, 90 S.Ct. 819, 25 L.Ed.2d 81 (1970). Without such a record, their claims are entirely too speculative and remote. Secondly, appellees have totally failed to demonstrate that the Japanese authorities have any interest whatsoever in their prosecuti…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. (Under Seal), 794 F.2d 920 (4th Cir. 1986)
  …34 U.S. 829, 98 S.Ct. 110, 54 L.Ed.2d 89 (1977); Childs v. McCord, 420 F.Supp. 428 (D.Md.1976), aff'd, 556 F. 2d 1178 (4 Cir.1977). Our conclusion also accords with the holdings in In re Parker, 411 F. 2d 1067, 1070 (10 Cir.1969), vacated as moot, 397 U.S. 96, 90 S.Ct. 819, 25 L.Ed.2d 81 (1970); and Phoenix Assurance Co. of Canada v. Runck, 317 N.W. 2d 402 (N.D.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 862, 103 S.Ct. 137, 74 L.Ed.2d 117 (1982). We reject petitioners’ contention that Murphy v. Waterfront Commission, 378…