HESTER
v.
ILLINOIS
HESTER
ILLINOIS
397 U.S. 660
Supreme Court of the United States (1970)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 25 L. Ed. 2d 642 · 90 S. Ct. 1408 · 1970 U.S. LEXIS 1983 · SCDB 1969-085
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Brennan, and Mr. Justice Marshall dissent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Liguori, 430 F.2d 842 (2d Cir. 1970)…oactive, nevertheless held that Leary applied to Scardino since his sentence had not been finally ordered) ; Rowell v. United States, 415 F. 2d 300 (8 Cir. 1969) (holding Leary is retroactive), remanded on other grounds, 397 U.S. 662, 90 S.Ct. 1407, 25 L.Ed.2d 642 (April 27, 1970). See Miller v. United States, 311 F.Supp. 705, 709-711 (N. D.Ohio 1970) (holding Leary is retroactive) ; United States v. King, 307 F. Supp. 217 (S.D.Cal.l969) (dictum that Leary is retroactive); contra, Barrett v. United States,…1 / 2
-
Bannister v. United States, 446 F.2d 1250 (3d Cir. 1971)…his cause is not moot. See Carafas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234, 88 S.Ct. 1556, 20 L.Ed.2d 554 (1968). . See also Rowell v. United States, 415 F. 2d 300 (8 Cir. 1969) (holding Leary retroactive), remanded on other grounds, 397 U.S. 662, 90 S.Ct. 1407, 25 L.Ed. 2d 642 (1970); Miller v. United States, 311 F.Supp. 705 (N.D.Ohio 1970) (holding Leary retroactive); United States v. King, 307 F.Supp. 217 (S.D.Cal.1969) (dictum that Leary is retroactive), aff’d, 430 F. 2d 1177 (9 Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 962,…