UNITED STATES
v.
ROWELL

U.S. | 1970-04-27
No. 863
397 U.S. 662 Supreme Court of the United States (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is also granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Buie v. United States, 396 U. S. 87.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Liguori, 430 F.2d 842 (2d Cir. 1970)
    …suming that Leary is not retroactive, nevertheless held that Leary applied to Scardino since his sentence had not been finally ordered) ; Rowell v. United States, 415 F. 2d 300 (8 Cir. 1969) (holding Leary is retroactive), remanded on other grounds, 397 U.S. 662, 90 S.Ct. 1407, 25 L.Ed.2d 642 (April 27, 1970). See Miller v. United States, 311 F.Supp. 705, 709-711 (N. D.Ohio 1970) (holding Leary is retroactive) ; United States v. King, 307 F. Supp. 217 (S.D.Cal.l969) (dictum that Leary is retroactive); con…
    1 / 2
  • Bannister v. United States, 446 F.2d 1250 (3d Cir. 1971)
    …xpired on February 28, 1970, his cause is not moot. See Carafas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234, 88 S.Ct. 1556, 20 L.Ed.2d 554 (1968). . See also Rowell v. United States, 415 F. 2d 300 (8 Cir. 1969) (holding Leary retroactive), remanded on other grounds, 397 U.S. 662, 90 S.Ct. 1407, 25 L.Ed. 2d 642 (1970); Miller v. United States, 311 F.Supp. 705 (N.D.Ohio 1970) (holding Leary retroactive); United States v. King, 307 F.Supp. 217 (S.D.Cal.1969) (dictum that Leary is retroactive), aff’d, 430 F. 2d 1177 (9 Cir. 197…
  • Scogin v. United States, 446 F.2d 416 (8th Cir. 1971)
    …2d at 847. See also Meadows v. United States, supra; Otey v. United States, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 142, 417 F. 2d 559 (1969); United States v. Lucia, supra. Cf. Rowell v. United States, 415 F. 2d 300 (8th Cir. 1969), vacated and remanded on other grounds 397 U.S. 662 (1970); 3 Drennon v. United States, 393 F. 2d 342 (8th Cir. 1968); Harris v. United States, 390 F. 2d 616 (8th Cir. 1968); Dillon v. United States, 389 F. 2d 381 (8th Cir. 1968). Similar reasoning compels us to hold that appellee did not waive the…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw