LAMPTON ET AL.
v.
BONIN ET AL.
LAMPTON ET AL.
BONIN ET AL.
397 U.S. 663
Supreme Court of the United States (1970)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 25 L. Ed. 2d 644 · 90 S. Ct. 1408 · 1970 U.S. LEXIS 1987 · SCDB 1969-086
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted and the judgment of the United States District Court is vacated. The case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Rosado v. Wyman, ante, p. 397.
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Black dissent for the reasons set forth in Mr. Justice Black’s dissenting opinion in Rosado v. Wyman, ante, p. 430.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jefferson v. Hackney, 406 U.S. 535 (U.S. 1972)…willingness to permit reductions in actual payments in return for the addition of more families to the rolls of AFDC recipients. Accord, Lampton v. Bonin, 304 F. Supp. 1384 (ED La. 1969), vacated and remanded for reconsideration in light of Rosado, 397 U. S. 663 (1970); Alvarado v. Schmidt, 317 F. Supp. 1027 (WD Wis. 1970). As I have pointed out above, the Texas [*564] system limits the number of AFDC recipients and eliminates marginal cases. This is directly contrary to the intent of Congress as we saw it…