JAMES ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES; AND HUTCHINS V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (41 total)

• United States v. Louin Ray Bright, 630 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …give the party searched added protection. It is settled law that generic classifications in a warrant are acceptable only when a more precise description is not possible. See James v. United States, 416 F. 2d 467, 473 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 907, 928, 90 S.Ct. 903, 938, 25 L.Ed.2d 87, 108 (1970). Accordingly, to the extent the police can only legitimately seize currency of known serial numbers, those serial numbers must be listed in the warrant. The question thus becomes whether it would h…
• United States v. Turner, 528 F.2d 143 (9th Cir. 1975)
  …848, 95 S.Ct. 86, 42 L.Ed.2d 78 (1974); United States v. Scharfman, 448 F. 2d 1352, 1354-55 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 919, 92 S.Ct. 944, 30 L.Ed.2d 789 (1972); James v. United States, 416 F. 2d 467, 472-73 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 907, 928, 90 S.Ct. 902, 903, 938, 25 L.Ed.2d 87, 108 (1970). These orders met that test. Section 2518(5) provides limitations on the period of time to be covered by the interception. The orders here did not exceed the times specified. This subsection a…
• United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …ly ascertain and identify the records to be seized. Cf. United States v. Timpani, 665 F. 2d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 1981); United States v. Morisse, 660 F. 2d 132, 136 (5th Cir. 1981); James v. United States, 416 F. 2d 467, 473 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 907, 90 S.Ct. 902, 25 L.Ed.2d 87 (1970). The only potentially troubling category is No. 1, records of “the receipt and disbursement of kickback funds.” Appellant argues that this phrase would have no specific meaning unless a file marked “kickback fund…