MOYLAN ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (52 total)

• United States v. Patrick, 542 F.2d 381 (7th Cir. 1976)
  …the requisite intent has been met; proof of motive, good or bad, has no relevance to that issue. 454 F. 2d at 392. Similarly, the Fourth Circuit stated as follows in the case of United States v. Moylan, 417 F. 2d 1002 (4th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 910, 90 S.Ct. 908, 25 L.Ed.2d 91 (1970): To read the term “willfully” to require a bad purpose would be to confuse the concept of intent with that of motive. The statutory requirement of willfullness is satisfied if the accused acted intentionally, wit…
• United States v. Cole, 755 F.2d 748 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …[*770] instructed the jury on how to treat the prosecutor’s improper remarks, thereby curing any prejudice. See Gradsky v. United States, 373 F. 2d 706, 711 (5th Cir. 1967). Hanley v. United States, 416 F. 2d 1160, 1166 (5th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 910, 90 S.Ct. 908, 25 L.Ed.2d 91 (1970). In sum, we find that the prosecutor overstepped the bounds of proper argument, but the district court’s instructions purged the case of any and all prejudice. We have examined appellants’ other contentions concer…
• United States v. Berrigan, 482 F.2d 171 (3d Cir. 1973)
  …it cannot be successfully maintained that there was practice and precedent in 1789 suggesting that the resolution of the fact issue presented here was entrusted to a jury. . See United States v. Moylan, 417 F. 2d 1002 (4th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 910, 90 S.Ct. 908, 25 L.Ed.2d 91 (1970). . Brief for appellants at 11. . Mr. Hoover’s statement before the subcommittee alleged: Willingness to employ any type of terrorist tactics is becoming increasingly apparent among extremist elements. One examp…