RELFORD

v.

COMMANDANT, U. S. DISCIPLINARY BARRACKS, FT. LEAVENWORTH

Citator

Cited By (32 total)

• United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392 (U.S. 1976)
  …loyees’ “entitlement” to money damages in an Executive Order, and to that extent might be distinguishable from the instant case. But cf. Ogletree v. McNamara, 449 F. 2d 93 (CA6 1971); Onotta v. United States, 415 F. 2d 1271 (CA8 1969), cert. denied, 397 U. S. 934 (1970); Manhattan-Bronx Postal Union v. Gronouski, 121 U. S. App. D. C. 321, 350 F. 2d 451 (1965), cert. denied, 382 U. S. 978 (1966). To the extent, however, that AUison and Pettit rely on the concept that an admission of misclassification by an…
• Gosa v. Mayden, 413 U.S. 665 (U.S. 1973)
  …control; that they were peacetime offenses; that the civilian courts were open; and that the offenses involved no question of the flouting of military authority, post security, or the integrity of military property. Later, in Relford v. Commandant, 397 U. S. 934 (1970), we granted certiorari “limited to retroactivity and scope of O'Callahan v. Parker.” When Relford was decided, 401 U. S. 355 (1971), we held that an offense committed on a military post by an individual in service, in violation of the securit…
• Relford v. Commandant, 401 U.S. 355 (U.S. 1971)
  …Court of Military Appeals.8 [*359] In the present federal habeas corpus case, instituted several years after the applicant’s conviction by court-martial, certiorari was granted “limited to retroactivity [*360] and scope of O’Callahan v. Parker . . . 397 U. S. 934 (1970). We thus do not reconsider O’Callahan. Our task here concerns only its application. I Isiah Relford, in 1961, was a corporal on active duty in the United States Army. He was stationed at Fort Dix, New Jersey. On September 4, 1961, the visi…