FEATHERSTON

v.

MITCHELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Dunkerley v. Hogan, 579 F.2d 141 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …se trial decisions to discharge the panel and begin anew, as it was cited to support re [*151] trial in cases where the defendant had become incapacitated or ill, as in this case. Featherston v. Mitchell, 418 F. 2d 582 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 937, 90 S.Ct. 945, 25 L.Ed.2d 117 (1970); United States v. Stein, 140 F.Supp. 761 (S.D.N.Y. 1956) (Perez and Potash cited). See also, Annot., 159 A.L.R. 750. The majority’s new “rule”, though, would seemingly require that a continuance be granted for a…
• In re Dionisio v. United States, 442 F.2d 276 (7th Cir. 1971)
  …ate certain tasks to government agents. Accordingly, we do not decide whether the deputization of the FBI attempted here was improper. . See In re Dymo Industries, Inc., 300 F.Supp. 532 (N.D.Cal.), aff’d, 418 F. 2d 500 (9th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 937, 90 S.Ct. 946, 25 L.Ed.2d 116 (1970). . We note that the Government in its peti-tition for enforcement described compliance with the grand jury’s demand for the exemplars as “essential and necessary to [its] investigation * * * as a standard of com…
• United States v. McEACHERN, 465 F.2d 833 (5th Cir. 1972)
  …o be unable to understand the proceedings against him or properly to assist in his own defense, the court is then under a mandatory duty to grant a § 4244 examination. See, e. g., Featherston v. Mitchell, 418 F. 2d 582 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 937, 90 S.Ct. 945, 25 L.Ed.2d 117 (1970); United States v. Wilkins, 334 F. 2d 698 (6th Cir. 1964); Lewellyng v. United States, supra; Caster v. United States, 319 F. 2d 850 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 953, 84 S.Ct. 972, 11 L.Ed.2d 973 (1964)…