MAXEY

v.

INDIANA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Henry, 749 F.2d 203 (5th Cir. 1984)
  …ates, 237 F. 2d at 172-73. See United States v. Smith, 407 F. 2d 202, 204 (5th Cir.1969) (entrapment instruction appropriate even though defendant admitted charged act of transferring narcotics but denied criminal intent to sell them), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 949, 90 S.Ct. 972, 25 L.Ed.2d 131 (1970); Sears v. United States, 343 F. 2d at 142-44 (5th Cir.1965) (reversing failure to instruct on entrapment where defendant denied knowledge of conspiracy). Thus, in United States v. Greenfield, 554 F. 2d 179 (5th…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Garrett, 716 F.2d 257 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …ot so “impermissibly inconsistent” as to preclude his argument that “to the extent that the jury may find culpability on his part, he was entrapped.” 554 F. 2d at 183. See also United States v. Smith, 407 F. 2d 202, 204 (5th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 949, 90 S.Ct. 972, 25 L.Ed.2d 131 (1970) (defenses of lack of guilt and entrapment permitted as not inconsistent where the defendant contended that he was an agent rather than principal, but that whatever role he played was a result of entrapment). In…
• United States v. Smith, 757 F.2d 1161 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …days allowed under the Speedy Trial Act whenever the court makes findings concerning the four statutory factors. The Speedy Trial Act is not at issue in this case. . Similarly, in United States v. Smith, 407 F. 2d 202 (5th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 949, 90 S.Ct. 972, 25 L.Ed.2d 131 (1970), a defendant charged with selling narcotics without demanding a written order from the purchaser in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 828, admitted participation in the transaction but denied criminal liability by claim…