KESLER

v.

DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By (57 total)

• Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185 (U.S. 1976)
  …section and the Rule, nor the elements necessary to establish such a cause of action. See, e. g., Brennan v. Midwestern United Life Ins. Co., 259 F. Supp. 673 (1966) and 286 F. Supp. 702 (ND Ind. 1968), aff’d, 417 F. 2d 147 (CA7 1969), cert. denied, 397 U. S. 989 (1970) (defendant held liable for giving active and knowing assistance to a third party engaged in violations of the securities laws). See generally Ruder, Multiple Defendants in Securities Law Fraud Cases: Aiding and Abetting, Conspiracy, In Pari…
• Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney, 489 U.S. 169 (U.S. 1989)
  …to the plaintiff, whether the plaintiff delayed in bringing or prosecuting the action, and other fundamental considerations of fairness.2 See Norte & Co. v. Huffines, 416 F. 2d 1189, 1191-1192 (CA2 1969), cert. denied sub nom. Muscat v. Norte & Co., 397 U. S. 989 (1970); City National Bank v. American Commonwealth Financial Corp., 608 F. Supp. 941, 943 (WDNC 1985); Fox v. Kane-Miller Corp., 398 F. Supp. 609, 651 (Md. 1975); see also generally Blau v. Lehman, 368 U. S. 403, 414 (1962) (“[IJnterest is not reco…
• Cent. Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, 511 U.S. 164 (U.S. 1994)
  …s.” Brennan v. Midwestern United Life Ins. Co., 259 F. Supp. 673, 680 (ND Ind. 1966) (borrowing [*194] formulation from the Restatement of Torts § 876(b) (1939)), later opinion, 286 F. Supp. 702 (1968), aff’d, 417 F. 2d 147 (CA7 1969), cert. denied, 397 U. S. 989 (1970). See also Pettit v. American Stock Exchange, 217 F Supp. 21, 28 (SDNY 1963). The Courts of Appeals have usually applied a familiar three-part test for aider and abettor liability, patterned on the Restatement of Torts formulation, that req…

  ← 1 / 2 →