OWENS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• United States v. Carmine Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …the seizure of the narcotics would have been proper under the “plain view” doctrine. Harris v. United States, 390 U.S. 234, 88 S.Ct. 992, 19 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1968); United States ex rel. Williams v. LaVallee, 415 F. 2d 643 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 997, 90 S.Ct. 1139, 25 L.Ed.2d 406 (1970). Springer’s arguments concerning the admissibility of the drugs and related paraphernalia are little more convincing. Springer contends that this “real” [*1116] evidence was irrelevant to the charges contained…
• United States v. Howard, 504 F.2d 1281 (8th Cir. 1974)
  …0 U.S. 969, 93 S.Ct. 1449, 35 L.Ed.2d 705 (1973); United States v. Malinowski, 472 F. 2d 850, 856 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 411 U.S 970, 93 S.Ct. 2164, 36 L.Ed.2d 693 (1973); United States v. Owens, 415 F. 2d 1308, 1315 (6th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 997, 90 S.Ct. 1138, 25 L.Ed.2d 406 (1970). [*1285] Judge Henley’s instructions properly set forth the essential elements of the offenses charged and correctly reflected the standards against which the jury had to test Howard’s volunteer defense.3 The F…
• United States v. Bamberger, 456 F.2d 1119 (3d Cir. 1972)
  …de discretion in determining what questions should be asked during voir dire, and it is the sole function of this court to ascertain whether that discretion has been abused. United States v. Owens, 415 F. 2d 1308, 1315 (6th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 997, 90 S. Ct. 1138, 25 L.Ed.2d 406 (1970). Our own independent examination of the voir dire proceedings discloses no abuse of discretion by the trial court. Indeed, counsel for Young asked members of the panel whether their schools were “integrated wi…