PARKER
v.
MARYLAND ET AL.
PARKER
MARYLAND ET AL.
397 U.S. 1003
Supreme Court of the United States (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hamilton C. Bushie and Doris Ann Bushie v. Stenocord Corp., 460 F.2d 116 (9th Cir. 1972)…1211, 1214 (9th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 939, 91 S.Ct. 934, 28 L.Ed.2d 219; Jos. E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke & Liquors, Ltd., 416 F. 2d 71 (9th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1062, 90 S.Ct. 752, 24 L.Ed.2d 755, reh. denied, 397 U.S. 1003, 90 S.Ct. 1113, 25 L.Ed.2d 415; Scanlan v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 388 F. 2d 918 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 391 U.S. 916, 88 S.Ct. 1810, 20 L.Ed.2d 654. In connection with refusals to deal, the courts have found to be “arrangements restraining tr…
-
Zidell Explorations, Inc. v. Conval Int'l, 719 F.2d 1465 (9th Cir. 1983)….1979). Chandler Supply Company v. GAF Corp., 650 F. 2d 983 (9th Cir.1980). In Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke & Liquors, Ltd., 416 F. 2d 71, 76 (9th Cir.1969), cert. den. 396 U.S. 1062, 90 S.Ct. 752, 24 L.Ed.2d 755 (1969), reh. den. 397 U.S. 1003, 90 S.Ct. 1113, 25 L.Ed.2d 415 (1969), the court said: Not every agreement is per se “in restraint of trade” within the meaning of § 1. See White Motor Company v. United States (1963) [372 U.S. 253] 83 S.Ct. [*1475] 696 [9 L.Ed.2d 738]. Thus, it is…