ORTIZ

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• Ortiz v. Carnival Corp., 826 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
• Glynn J. Pelotto v. L & N Towing Co., 604 F.2d 396 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …ove the seaman’s physical condition, it is proper to declare that the point of maximum cure has been achieved. Stewart v. Waterman S.S. Corp., E.D.La., 1968, 288 F.Supp. 629, aff’d, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F. 2d 1045, 1969 A.M.C. 1648, cert. denied, 1970, 397 U.S. 1011, 90 S.Ct. 1239, 25 L.Ed.2d 423; H. Baer, Admiralty Law of the Supreme Court § 1-2, at 6-10 (3d ed. 1979). In dismissing the present action for maintenance and cure, the trial judge seemed overly preoccupied with the failure of Pelotto to litigate h…
• United States ex rel. Carlos Ortiz v. Fritz, 476 F.2d 37 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …392 U.S. 293, 88 S.Ct. 1921, 20 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1968). . Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lyman, J.), aff'd, People v. Ortiz, 30 A.D.2d 510, 294 N.Y.S.2d 625 (1st Dep’t 1968), aff’d, 25 N.Y.2d 863, 303 N.Y.S.2d 879, 250 N.E. 2d 872 (1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1011, 90 S.Ct. 1242, 25 L.Ed.2d 425 (1970). It should be noted that Chief Judge Fuld and Judge Burke of the Court of Appeals concurred solely because they considered themselves bound by People v. McNeil, 24 N.Y.2d 550, 301 N.Y.S.2d 503, 249 N.E. 2d 383 (…