SCHMID

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733 (2d Cir. 1984)
  …trial counsel specifically requested and urged the trial court to give the instruction now objected to. In such circumstances we decline to find error, plain or otherwise.” United States v. Thurman, 417 F. 2d 752, 753 (D.C. Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1026, 90 S.Ct. 1269, 25 L.Ed.2d 535 (1970). See also Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494, 500 n. 2, 71 S.Ct. 857, 862 n. 2, 95 L.Ed. 1137 (“petitioners themselves requested a charge similar to the one given, and under Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Cr…
• United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723 (3d Cir. 1974)
  …Such a contradiction would constitute impeachment on a collateral matter through the utilization of extrinsic evidence, a maneuver which is forbidden in this Circuit. See United States v. Hendrickson, 417 F. 2d 225, 228 (3d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1026, 90 S.Ct. 1271, 25 L.Ed.2d 537 (1970). . Tr. 4329. . This Court has recently found prosecutorial conduct improper, but not prejudicial, in a host of cases. See, e. g., United States v. Benson, 487 F. 2d 978 (3d Cir. 1973); United States v. LeFevre…
• United States v. Bermudez, 526 F.2d 89 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …leading in the conspiracy context of this case. However, viewing the instructions as a whole, see, e. g., United States v. Cisnecos, 491 F. 2d 1068 (5th Cir. 1974); United States v. Thurman, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 184, 417 F. 2d 752 (1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1026, 90 S.Ct. 1269, 25 L.Ed.2d 535 (1970), and considering that a second set of instructions was given at the same time, the validity of which was not challenged, we find no prejudice to the defendants stemming from the mid-trial charges. VII. District…