MIAMI GRAY LINE BOATS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
DADE COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MIAMI GRAY LINE BOATS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
DADE COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
195 So. 2d 47
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 28 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See: Mayflower, Inc. v. Suskind, Fla.App.1959, 112 So.2d 394; Southeastern Sales & Service Co. v. T. T. Watson, Inc., Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 239; Wise v. Quina, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 590; Jackson Grain Company v. Kemp, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 513; 25 Fla.Jur., Pleadings, § 80.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
Geer v. Ames Bennett and John B. Marion, 237 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970)…ermined by the court unless the facts are not only undisputed but are also such that all reasonable men in the exercise of fair and impartial judgment must draw the inference and conclusion therefrom of non-negligence. Leaks v. Adeimy, Fla.App.1967, 195 So. 2d 47. An architect has been defined as one skilled in practical architecture, one whose profession it is to devise the plans and ornamentation of buildings or other structures and supervise their construction. An architect or engineer has also been defi…
-
Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. In-Sink-Erator, 252 So. 2d 856 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)…nt of the parties must be resolved as a matter of fact. The existence of a genuine issue as to a material fact bars the granting of a summary judgment. Brown v. Warren Wooten Ford, Inc., Fla.App.1971, 245 So. 2d 268; Leaks v. Adeimy, Fla.App. 1967, 195 So. 2d 47; O’Grady v. Wickman, Fla.App.1968, 213 So. 2d 321; Holl v. Talcott, Fla.1966, 191 So. 2d 40. The above issues were not negated by the pleadings, affidavits, depositions, interrogatories and answers to requests for admissions. Accordingly, the summa…
-
LAB v. Hall, 200 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967)…fact from the proofs proffered at the hearing must be drawn against the movant and in favor of the party opposing the motion. Central Investments, Inc. v. Old Southern Golf Utility Corp., Fla.App. 1967, 197 So. 2d 17; Leaks v. Adeimy, Fla.App. 1967, 195 So. 2d 47; Warring v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Fla.App.1958, 105 So. 2d 915. The function of the court in passing on a motion for a summary judgment is to determine whether there is a genuine issue of any material fact, not the determination of the issue of fact.…
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Wise v. Ignatius C. Quina and Bertha N. Quina, 174 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965)
- Se. Sales & Serv. Co. v. T. T. Watson, Inc., 172 So. 2d 239 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
- Mayflower, Inc. v. Suskind, 112 So. 2d 394 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959)
- The Carter Corp. v. The Albanese Co., Inc., 177 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965)
- Jackson Grain Co. v. Kemp, 177 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)