IN RE BURRUS ET AL.

U.S. | 1970-04-20
No. 1544
397 U.S. 1036 Supreme Court of the United States (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 20 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. LEE, 455 U.S. 252 (U.S. 1982)
    …system because tax payments were spent in a manner that violates their religious belief. See, e. g., Lull v. Commissioner, 602 F. 2d 1166 (CA4 1979), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 1014 (1980); Autenrieth v. Cullen, 418 F. 2d 586 (CA9 1969), cert. denied, 397 U. S. 1036 (1970). Because the broad public interest in maintaining a sound tax system is of such a high order, religious belief in conflict with the payment of taxes affords no basis for resisting the tax. HH I h — I Congress has accommodated, to the extent…
  • McKEIVER v. Pennsylvania, 403 U.S. 528 (U.S. 1971)
    …n the Supreme Court of North Carolina deleted that portion of the order in each case relating to commitment, but otherwise affirmed. In re Burrus, 275 N. C. 517, 169 S. E. 2d 879 (1969). Two justices dissented without opinion. We granted certiorari. 397 U. S. 1036 (1970). . Ill It is instructive to review, as an illustration, the substance of Justice Roberts’ opinion for the Pennsylvania court. He observes, 438 Pa., at 343, 265 A. 2d, at 352, that “[f]or over sixty-five years the Supreme Court gave no consi…
  • United States v. Malinowski, 472 F.2d 850 (3d Cir. 1973)
    …panion argument of refusal to participate in what he called a violation of principles of international law, the United Nations Charter, and the Geneva agreements of 1954. . See also Autenrieth v. Cullen, 418 F. 2d 586 (9th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1036, 90 S.Ct. 1353, 25 L.Ed.2d 647 (1970) ; Swallow v. United States, 325 F. 2d 97 (10th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 951, 84 S.Ct. 1630, 12 L.Ed.2d 497 (1964). . The good faith argument has also been couched in an “assertion that appellant belie…

Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw