NEW MEXICO

v.

PAUL

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• State v. Ecker, 311 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 1975)
  …(1969), the Court of Appeals of Michigan upheld a loitering ordinance which was limited in its application to those persons who were obstructing free passage of pedestrians. In United States v. Cassiagnol, 420 F. 2d 868 (4th Cir. 1970), cert. den. 397 U.S. 1044, 90 S.Ct. 1364, 25 L.Ed.2d 654, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has approved as constitutional a General Services Administration regulation which prohibits “unseemly or disorderly conduct and unwarranted loitering and assembly” upon government p…
• State v. Beasley, 317 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 1975)
  …s restrictive construction doctrine in Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 382 U.S. 87, 86 S.Ct. 211, 15 L.Ed.2d 176 (1965). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals adopted this doctrine in United States v. Cassiagnol, 420 F. 2d 868 (4th Cir. 1970), cert. den. 397 U.S. 1044, 90 S.Ct. 1364, 25 L.Ed.2d 654. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals acknowledged the restrictive constitutional construction doctrine in Wiegand v. Seaver, 504 F. 2d 303 (5th Cir. 1974). In that case the court struck down our disorderly conduct statu…
• United States v. Liddy, 509 F.2d 428 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …69, 571 (2d Cir. 1970); Estrella-Ortega v. United States, 423 F. 2d 509, 510— 511 (9th Cir. 1970); United States v. Barbour, supra, 137 U.S.App.D.C. at 118, 420 F. 2d at 1321; United States v. Cassiagnol, 420 F. 2d 868, 879 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1044, 90 S.Ct. 1364, 25 L.Ed.2d 654 (1970); United States v. Klass, 166 F. 2d 373, 376 (3d Cir. 1948); Annot. 67 A.L.R.2d 538, 550-551 (1959). . Quercia v. United States, supra; United States v. Barbour, supra, 137 U.S.App.D.C. at 117-118, 420 F. 2d at…

  ← 1 / 2 →