GLANDERS

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Nevail Mitchell v. Wyrick, 698 F.2d 940 (8th Cir. 1983)
  …9 F.Supp. 1196 (W.D.Mo.1975), aff’d, 527 F. 2d 899 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 924, 96 S.Ct. 2634, 49 L.Ed.2d 379 (1976); United States ex rel. Hunter v. Follette, 307 F.Supp. 1023 (S.D.N.Y.1969), aff’d, 420 F. 2d 779 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1067, 90 S.Ct. 1506, 25 L.Ed.2d 689 (1970). [*942] First, a constitutional violation needs to be asserted. The district court indicated that it had carefully reviewed the transcript hearing and stipulation and had read a letter sent to the Clerk by Mitch…
• Bransford v. Brown, 806 F.2d 83 (6th Cir. 1986)
  …oduce the transcript is not invidiously motivated. See United States ex rel. Smart v. Pate, 318 F. 2d 559 (7th Cir.1963); United States ex rel. Hunter v. Follette, 307 F.Supp. 1023 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 420 F. 2d 779 (2nd Cir.1969), cert. denied, [*86] 397 U.S. 1067, 90 S.Ct. 1506, 25 L.Ed.2d 689 (1970). We agree with these decisions, and hold that in this case, where the defendant’s trial attorney communicated with his appellate attorney, the absence of the jury instruction transcripts is not a per se denial o…