UNITED STATES

v.

DAVIS ET UX.; WATTS ET AL. V. SEWARD SCHOOL BOARD ET AL.; BURDETTE V. TENNESSEE; JAMERSON V. DELHEY ET AL.; MAGEE V. WHITTAKER, SHERIFF, ET AL.; MOONEY V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (U.S. 1980)
  …tial majority of the Courts of Appeals require defendants who contend that multiple representation violated their Sixth Amendment rights to identify an actual conflict of interest. See United States v. Lovano, 420 F. 2d 769, 773 (CA2), cert. denied, 397 U. S. 1071 (1970); United States v. Atkinson, 565 F. 2d 1283, 1284-1285 (CA4 1977), cert. denied, 436 U. S. 944 (1978); Foxworth v. Wainwright, supra, at 1077; Thacker v. Bordenkircher, 590 F. 2d 640, 642 (CA6), cert. denied, 442 U. S. 912 (1979); United State…
• Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475 (U.S. 1978)
  …[(CA2 1975)]; United States v. Vowteras, 500 F. 2d 1210, 1211 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U. S. 1069 . . . (1974); United States v. Wisniewski, 478 F. 2d 274, 281 (2d Cir. 1973); United States v. Lovano, 420 F. 2d 769, 773 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 397 U. S. 1071 .. . (1970). In all of these cases the trial court had carefully inquired as to the possibility of prejudice and elicited the personal responses of the defendants [*495] involved. Here the record is barren of any inquiry by the court or any concer…
• United States ex rel. George Hart v. Davenport, 478 F.2d 203 (3d Cir. 1973)
  …352 F. 2d 359 (1965). On the other hand, we have rejected the approach that before relief' will be considered the defendant must show some specific instance of prejudice. But see United States v. Lovano, 420 F. 2d 769, 773 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1071, 90 S.Ct. 1515, 25 L.Ed.2d 694 (1970); United States v. Alberti, 470 F. 2d 878, 882 (2d Cir. 1972). Instead, we have held that upon a showing of a possible conflict of interest or prejudice, however remote, we will regard joint representation as c…