SAYNE

v.

SHIPLEY

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (U.S. 1978)
  …(1958) (applying Talton to Fifth Amendment due process claim); Groundhog v. Keeler, 442 F. 2d 674, 678 (CA10 1971). But see Colliflower v. Garland, 342 F. 2d 369 (CA9 1965), and Settler v. Yakima Tribal Court, 419 F. 2d 486 (CA9 1969), cert. denied, 398 U. S. 903 (1970), both holding that where a tribal court was so pervasively regulated by a federal agency that it was in effect a federal instrumentality, a writ of habeas corpus would lie to a person detained by that court in violation of the Constitution.…
• Taylor v. M. M. (Hoot) Gibson, 529 F.2d 709 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …e sued under Section 1983 when they are acting in conspiracy or collusion with state officials. United States v. Price, 1966, 383 U.S. 787, 86 S.Ct. 1152, 16 L.Ed.2d 267; Fulton v. Emerson Electric Co., 5 Cir. 1969, 420 F. 2d 527, cert. denied 1970, 398 U.S. 903, 90 S.Ct. 1689, 26 L.Ed.2d 61; Gomez v. Fla. State Employment Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F. 2d 569. Taylor alleged facts which if true are supportive of a finding of conspiracy authorizing recovery under Section 1983. While characterized by the defen…
• McNALLY v. The Pulitzer Publ'g Co. & Ted Gest, 532 F.2d 69 (8th Cir. 1976)
  ….Ct. 1152, 1157, 16 L.Ed.2d 267, 272 (1966); Smith v. Brookshire Brothers, 519 F. 2d 93, 94-95 (5th Cir. 1975); Barnes v. Dorsey, 480 F. 2d 1057, 1061 (8th Cir. 1973); Fulton v. Emerson Electric Co., 420 F. 2d 527, 530 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 903, 90 S.Ct. 1689, 26 L.Ed.2d 61 (1970). In the instant case, the alleged unlawful official conduct is that of a federal official and private parties and is thus not subject to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.7 Nevertheless, the Supreme Court has clearly indicated t…