BISHOP PROCESSING CO.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (33 total)

• Hodel v. Va. Surface Mining & Reclamation Ass'n, Inc., 452 U.S. 264 (U.S. 1981)
  …2d 1317, 1325 (CA6 1974); Pennsylvania v. EPA, 500 F. 2d 246, 259 (CA3 1974); South Terminal Corp. v. EPA, 504 F. 2d 646, 677 (CA1 1974); United States v. Bishop Processing Co., 287 F. Supp. 624 (Md. 1968), aff’d, 423 F. 2d 469 (CA4), cert. denied, 398 U. S. 904 (1970). Section 515 (d)(4), 30 U. S. C. § 1265 (d)(4) (1976 ed., Supp. Ill), defines a “steep slope” as “any slope above twenty degrees or such lesser slope as may be defined by the regulatory authority after consideration of soil, climate, and oth…
• United States v. Bishop, 412 U.S. 346 (U.S. 1973)
  …at “willfully” in § 7201 has a different meaning from the same term in § 7203. See United States v. Ming, 466 F. 2d 1000, 1004 (CA7), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 915 (1972) (§§ 7201 and 7203); United States v. Matosky, 421 F. 2d 410 (CA7), cert. denied, 398 U. S. 904 (1970) (§7203); United States v. Haseltine, 419 F. 2d, at 581; Edwards v. United States, 375 F. 2d, at 867; United States v. Schipani, 362 F. 2d 825, 831 (GA2), cert. denied, 385 U. S. 934 (1966). This Court may be somewhat responsible for this impr…
• United States v. Polizzi, 500 F.2d 856 (9th Cir. 1974)
  …were necessary to prevent the jury from finding a violation of § 463.300. It is also highly unlikely that reading that section in these circumstances confused the jury. Cf. United States v. Lookretis, 422 F. 2d 647, 651 (7 Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 904, 90 S.Ct. 1693, 26 L.Ed.2d 63 (1970). Although conceding that the court properly charged the jury that violations of the regulations of the Nevada State Gaming Commission could not constitute criminal offenses, appellants nevertheless assert that e…