POTTS
v.
UNITED STATES
POTTS
UNITED STATES
398 U.S. 941
Supreme Court of the United States (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
United States v. Decoster, 624 F.2d 196 (D.C. Cir. 1976)…d at 433-434. . See, e. g., United States v. Hurt, 177 U.S. App.D.C. 15, 18, 543 F. 2d 162, 165 (1976); Diggs v. Welch, supra note 6, 80 U.S.App.D.C. at 6-7, 148 F. 2d at 668-669; Leventhal v. Gavin, 421 F. 2d 270, 272-273 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 941, 90 S.Ct. 1857, 26 L.Ed.2d 277 (1970); United States v. Bubar, supra note 34, 567 F. 2d at 201-202; United States v. Wight, 176 F. 2d 376, 379-380 (2d Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 950, 70 S.Ct. 478, 94 L.Ed. 586 (1950); United States ex rel. J…
-
United States v. Projansky, 465 F.2d 123 (2d Cir. 1972)…. 654, 21 L.Ed.2d 581 (1969). See United States v. Silverman, 449 F. 2d 1341, 1344 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 918, 92 S.Ct. 943, 30 L.Ed.2d 788 (1972); United States v. Potts, 420 F. 2d 964, 964-965 (4th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 941, 90 S.Ct. 1855, 26 L.Ed.2d 276 (1970); Krause v. Chartier, 406 F. 2d 898, 901 (1st Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 960, 89 S.Ct. 2102, 23 L.Ed.2d 749 (1969).…
-
United States v. Daily, 921 F.2d 994 (10th Cir. 1990)…8), these cases do not offer useful precedent for answering the question at issue here. See generally Kaufman v. United States, 394 U.S. 217, 89 S.Ct. 1068, 22 L.Ed.2d 227 (1969); Hayes v. United States, 419 F. 2d 1364 (10th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 941, 90 S.Ct. 1856, 26 L.Ed.2d 276 (1970); Gaitan v. United States, 317 F. 2d 494 (10th Cir.1963); Williams v. United States, 307 F. 2d 366 (9th Cir.1962); United States v. Barillas, 291 F. 2d 743 (2d Cir.1961); United States v. White, 237 F.Supp. 644 (…
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence