HARRIS
v.
WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR
HARRIS
WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR
398 U.S. 942
Supreme Court of the United States (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stevens v. United States, 440 F.2d 144 (6th Cir. 1971)…ir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1004, 90 S.Ct. 554, 24 L.Ed.2d 495; White v. United States, 395 F. 2d 5 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 928, 89 S.Ct. 260, 21 L.Ed.2d 266. See also United States v. Biancofiori, 422 F. 2d 584 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 942, 90 S.Ct. 1857, 26 L.Ed.2d 277. It is not necessary for Congress to await the total dislocation of commerce before it may provide reasonable preventive measures for the protection of commerce. Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294, 301, 85 S.Ct. 377,…
-
United States v. DeROSA, 670 F.2d 889 (9th Cir. 1982)…nt can show that his defense probably would have benefited from commenting on a co-defendant’s refusal to testify, denial of the motion to sever is not prejudicial.” United States v. De La Cruz Bellinger, 422 F. 2d 723, 111 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 942, 90 S.Ct. 1860, 26 L.Ed.2d 278 (1970). We are unpersuaded by DeSantis’ argument that he would have benefited from the inference and so we hold that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying DeSantis the opportunity to make the inferenc…