SAMUEL JUNIOR THOMAS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
SAMUEL JUNIOR THOMAS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
195 So. 2d 256
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed under the authority of Carroll v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 266; Taylor v. State, Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 402; and Dozier v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 192 So. 2d 506, opinion filed December 7, 1966.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
SHANNON, Acting C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thomas v. State, 234 So. 2d 715 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970)…n the trial Court proceedings when he pleaded guilty. On September 9, 1966, the trial Court denied the Rule 1 motion, from which order Thomas appealed to this [*716] Court. On February 22, 1967, we affirmed the order. Thomas v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 195 So. 2d 256. In our opinion we cited three cases in support of our affirmance, all by this 2nd District Court. On June 19, 1968, Thomas filed in the trial Court a second motion to vacate the judgment and sentence, which motion, on June 27, 1968, was denied by…
Authorities Cited
- Ellis Taylor, Jr. v. State, 171 So. 2d 402 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
- Garnest Washington Hudson v. State, 192 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)
- Laures James Dozier v. State, 192 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)
- Carroll v. State, 172 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)