CROUSE, WARDEN
v.
WOOD
CROUSE, WARDEN
WOOD
399 U.S. 520
Supreme Court of the United States (1970)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 90 S. Ct. 2234 · 26 L. Ed. 2d 778 · 1970 U.S. LEXIS 1265 · SCDB 1969-138
Cited by 5 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of cer-tiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of Chambers v. Maroney, ante, p. 42.
Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. However, the case having been taken for review, he would affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in Chambers v. Maroney, ante, p. 55.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Robinson Protective Alarm Co. v. City OF Philadelphia, 581 F.2d 371 (3d Cir. 1978)…is an adequate state remedy.8 Steffel v. Thompson, 415 U.S. 452, 472, 94 S.Ct. 1209, 39 L.Ed.2d 505 (1974); Lynch v. Household Finance Corp., 405 U.S. 538, 542 n.6, 92 S.Ct. 1113, 31 L.Ed.2d 424 (1972); Perez v. Ledesma, 401 U.S. 82, 126-28 & n.17, 90 S.Ct. 2234, 26 L.Ed.2d 790 (1971) (Brennan, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). Against the backdrop of the purposes of the Tax Injunction Act and the policies of federal equity practice, the Holmes opinion, relied on by the plaintiffs, is plainly…
-
Wood v. Crouse, 436 F.2d 1077 (10th Cir. 1971)…Court vacated our judgment and remanded the case for further consideration in the light of its opinion in Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 90 S.Ct. 1975, 26 L.Ed.2d 419, decided after our opinion on this issue. Crouse, Warden v. Wood, 399 U.S. 520, 90 S.Ct. 2234, 26 L.Ed.2d 778. We have now considered additional briefs submitted and have reexamined the record. We conclude that under the Chambers opinion the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed. The sole issue raised in this habeas corpus proce…