HUTCHERSON ET AL.
v.
LEHTIN ET AL.
HUTCHERSON ET AL.
LEHTIN ET AL.
399 U.S. 522
Supreme Court of the United States (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Gunn v. University Committee to End the War in Viet Nam, ante, p. 383, and Mitchell v. Donovan, 398 U. S. 427.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lawrence and next friend v. Chater, 516 U.S. 163 (U.S. 1996)…, e. g., Chiarella v. United States, 341 U. S. 946 (1951) (“[u]pon consideration of the record and [*183] the confession of error by the Solicitor General,” remanding to the District Court for resentencing) (emphasis added); Penner v. United States, 399 U. S. 522 (1970) (“[o]n the basis of a confession of error by the Solicitor General and of an independent review of the record,” remanding to the District Court “with instructions to dismiss the indictment”). Our recent practice, however, has been to remand…
-
Daniel v. Waters, 515 F.2d 485 (6th Cir. 1975)…the constitutional merits of a challenged statute and does not grant or deny preliminary injunctive relief is not appeala-ble to the Supreme Court. Rather, the relevant Court of Appeals must review the appeal’s merits. See also Hutcherson v. Lehtin, 399 U.S. 522, 90 S.Ct. 2238, 26 L.Ed.2d 781 (1970), where the Supreme Court remanded for consideration by the Ninth Circuit of an appeal of a three-judge district court order which had abstained from considering one aspect of the plaintiffs’ constitutional attac…
Authorities Cited
- Mitchell v. Donovan, 398 U.S. 427 (U.S. 1970)